Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for scapular fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Presentation of a minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of scapular fractures and the clinical outcome using this technique. INDICATIONS: Displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula body and glenoid neck (AO 14B and 14F) and simple intra-articular fractures of the glenoid. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Complex intra-articular fractures and isolated fractures of the coracoid base. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Make a straight or slightly curved incision along the lateral margin of the scapula leaving the deltoid fascia intact. Identify the interval between the teres minor muscle and infraspinatus to visualize the lateral column, whilst retracting the deltoid to visualize the glenoid neck. Reduce and align the fracture using direct and indirect reduction tools. A second window on the medial border of the scapula can be made to aid reduction and/or to augment stability. Small (2.0-2.7 mm) plates in a 90° configuration on the lateral border and, if required, on the medial border are used. Intra-operative imaging confirms adequate reduction and extra-articular screw placement. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Direct postoperative free functional nonweight-bearing rehabilitation limited to 90° abduction for the first 6 weeks. Sling for comfort. Free range of motion and permissive weight-bearing after 6 weeks. RESULTS: We collected data from 35 patients treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) between 2011 and 2021. Average age was 53 ± 15.1 years (range 21-71 years); 17 had a type B and 18 a type F fracture according the AO classification. All patients suffered concomitant injuries of which thoracic (n = 33) and upper extremity (n = 25) injuries were most common. Double plating of the lateral border (n = 30) was most commonly performed as described in the surgical technique section. One patient underwent an additional osteosynthesis 3 months after initial surgery due to pain and lack of radiological signs of healing of a fracture extension into the spine of the scapula. In the same patient, the plate on the spine of scapula was later removed due to plate irritation. In 2 patients postoperative images showed a screw protruding into the glenohumeral joint requiring revision surgery. After standardisation of intra-operative imaging following these two cases, intra-articular screw placement did not occur anymore. No patient suffered from iatrogenic nerve injury and none developed a wound infection.

Concepts, utilization, and perspectives on the Dutch Nationwide Trauma registry: a position paper.

Over the last decades, the Dutch trauma care have seen major improvements. To assess the performance of the Dutch trauma system, in 2007, the Dutch Nationwide Trauma Registry (DNTR) was established, which developed into rich source of information for quality assessment, quality improvement of the trauma system, and for research purposes. The DNTR is one of the most comprehensive trauma registries in the world as it includes 100% of all trauma patients admitted to the hospital through the emergency department. This inclusive trauma registry has shown its benefit over less inclusive systems; however, it comes with a high workload for high-quality data collection and thus more expenses. The comprehensive prospectively collected data in the DNTR allows multiple types of studies to be performed. Recent changes in legislation allow the DNTR to include the citizen service numbers, which enables new possibilities and eases patient follow-up. However, in order to maximally exploit the possibilities of the DNTR, further development is required, for example, regarding data quality improvement and routine incorporation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. This would improve the quality assessment and scientific output from the DNTR. Finally, the DNTR and all other (European) trauma registries should strive to ensure that the trauma registries are eligible for comparisons between countries and healthcare systems, with the goal to improve trauma patient care worldwide.

Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation in fragility fractures of the pelvis: Comparison of two different augmentation techniques.

OBJECTIVE: Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming increasingly common. Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation is an accepted and safe treatment method for FFP. Augmentation is an option to optimize fixation strength of the screws. This study aims to compare patient mobility and the occurrence of complications after operative treatment of FFP utilizing two different augmentation techniques. METHODS: All patients who received augmented sacroiliac screws for the treatment of FFPs between 01.01.2017 and 31.12.2018 at one of the two participating hospitals were included. The operative techniques only differed with regards to the augmentation method used. At the one hospital cannulated screws were used. Definitive screw placement followed augmentation. At the other hospital cannulated and fenestrated screws were used, permitting definitive screw placement prior to augmentation. RESULTS: In total, 59 patients were included. The NRS score for pain was significantly lower after surgery. Preoperative mobility levels could be maintained or improved in 2/3 of the patients. There were no fatal complications. Two revision surgeries were performed because of screw misplacement. There were no significant differences between the two augmentation techniques in terms of complications. CONCLUSION: Both augmentation techniques have a low complication rate and are safe methods to maintain patients' mobility level. The authors advocate early consideration of surgical treatment for patients with FFP. Augmentation can be considered a safe addition when performing percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation.

Long-term follow-up of patients with displaced scapular fractures managed surgically and non-operatively.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy remains on which patients with displaced scapula fractures benefit from surgery. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare and describe long-term patient-reported outcomes of patients with displaced scapula fractures treated both surgically and conservatively. METHODS: This study included patients with intra- and extra-articular scapula fractures, treated between 2010 and 2020 in a Swiss level 1 trauma centre. The decision to operate was based on standardized criteria for fracture displacement. Patients with isolated Bankart lesions (Ideberg 1) and process fractures (AO type 14-A) were excluded. Primary outcomes were functional patient reported measures (DASH score) and quality of life (EQ5D score). Secondary outcomes were complications, radiological union, satisfaction with treatment, pain and range of motion. RESULTS: Out of 486 cases, 74 patients had displaced scapula fractures. Forty patients were treated surgically and 34 were treated conservatively. Significantly more patients with intra-articular fractures and high-energy trauma were treated surgically. Fifty percent returned the questionnaires after a mean follow-up of 47 months (± SD 36). The mean DASH score of this group was 12 (SD 15.6), with a mean of 14.7 (SD 15.9) in the surgery group and 9.8 (SD 14.6) in the non-operative group (p = 0.7). Multivariate analysis did not show statistically significant correlating factors. No significant differences in quality of life were observed. Patients rated their treatment with a mean of 8.6/10 (SD 1.8). Among surgically treated patients, 19 underwent a deltoid sparing procedure with significant shorter time to union than those that underwent deltoid release (23 vs. 49 weeks, p<0.01). Complications occurred in 3/28 surgically treated patients and all three required a reoperation. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, functional results after conservative and surgical treatment were similar, despite more complex fractures and more intra-articular fractures being treated surgically. Osteosynthesis of both intra- and extra-articular scapula fractures is safe and leads to good functional results, furthermore, new minimal invasive techniques may lead to faster bone healing and return to work and sports.

Intramedullary screw fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures - A systematic review of 837 patients.

Intramedullary screw (IMS) fixation is increasingly used as an alternative treatment option in metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of the hand. However, this technique is currently the subject of controversy among hand surgeons. The aim of this systematic review was to gain insight on radiological, functional and patient-rated outcomes reported in literature. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL databases was conducted on March 1st, 2021. All studies reporting on fracture union, complications, and functional and patient-rated outcome in IMS fixation of metacarpal and/or phalangeal fractures were selected. Two prospective and 16 retrospective cohort studies were included, encompassing a total of 837 patients with 958 fractures (693 metacarpal, 222 proximal phalangeal and 43 middle phalangeal). Mean surgery duration was 26.4 min (range 5-60 min). Union was ultimately achieved in all fractures in a mean of 5.7 weeks (range 2-12 weeks). The procedure-related complication rate was 3.2%. The most frequently reported complication was limitation of joint motion, occurring in 2.0% of cases. Incidence of other complications, including loss of reduction, infection and screw protrusion did not exceed 1%. Overall mean total active motion averaged 243° and grip strength reached 97.5% of the contralateral side. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score averaged 3.7 points. Duration of sick leave was 7.3 weeks. According to the findings of this systematic review, IMS fixation is a time-saving and safe minimally invasive solution for both metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, with a low rate of complications and promising functional and patient-rated results.

Plate vs. nail for extra-articular distal tibia fractures: How should we personalize surgical treatment? A meta-analysis of 1332 patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for distal diaphyseal or metaphyseal tibia fractures is challenging and the optimal surgical strategy remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare plate fixation with nailing in terms of operation time, non-union, time-to-union, mal-union, infection, subsequent re-interventions and functional outcomes (quality of life scores, knee- and ankle scores). METHODS: A search was performed in PubMed/Embase/CINAHL/CENTRAL for all study designs comparing plate fixation with intramedullary nailing (IMN). Data were pooled using RevMan and presented as odds ratios (OR), risk difference (RD), weighted mean difference (WMD) or weighted standardized mean difference (WSMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI). All analyzes were stratified for study design. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies with 1332 patients were analyzed, including ten RCTs (n = 873) and five observational studies (n = 459). IMN leads to a shorter time-to-union (WMD: 0.4 months, 95%CI 0.1 - 0.7), shorter time-to-full-weightbearing (WMD: 0.6 months, 95%CI 0.4 - 0.8) and shorter operation duration (WMD: 15.5 min, 95%CI 9.3 - 21.7). Plating leads to a lower risk for mal-union (RD: -10%, OR: 0.4, 95%CI 0.3 - 0.6), but higher risk for infection (RD: 8%, OR: 2.4, 95%CI 1.5 - 3.8). No differences were detected with regard to non-union (RD: 1%, OR: 0.7, 95%CI 0.3 - 1.7), subsequent re-interventions (RD: 4%, OR: 1.3, 95%CI 0.8 - 1.9) and functional outcomes (WSMD: -0.4, 95%CI -0.9 - 0.1). The effect estimates of RCTs and observational studies were equal for all outcomes except for time to union and mal-union. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory results can be obtained with both plate fixation and nailing for distal extra-articular tibia fractures. However, nailing is associated with higher rates of mal-union and anterior knee pain while plate fixation results in an increased risk of infection. This study provides a guideline towards a personalized approach and facilitates shared decision-making in surgical treatment of distal extra-articular tibia fractures. The definitive treatment should be case-based and aligned to patient-specific needs in order to minimize the risk of complications.

Does preoperative hemodynamic preconditioning improve morbidity and mortality after traumatic hip fracture in geriatric patients? A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Dehydration is a major problem in the older population with traumatic hip fractures (THF). A preoperative hemodynamic preconditioning (PHP) protocol may help in achieving hemodynamic stability to ensure adequate perfusion and oxygenation using only clinical parameters to assess cardiovascular performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study in geriatric trauma patients was conducted in a Level 1 Trauma Centre in Switzerland. Patients over the age of 70 with THFs and with Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality (P-POSSUM) scores ≥ 5% who underwent surgical treatment between February 2015 and October 2017 were included. It was hypothesized that patients whose hemodynamic stability was optimised before surgery would have fewer complications and reduced mortality postoperatively. Primary outcomes were complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (HLOS) and place of discharge. RESULTS: 100 patients were included in the PHP group and 79 patients were included in the non-PHP group. The median age was 86.5 (82-90) in the PHP group and 86 (82-90) in the non-PHP group. Patients who had been treated according to the PHP protocol showed a significant reduction in mortality at 30 days (p = 0.02). The PHP group showed an 8.1 and 3.5% reduced mortality at 90 days and at 1 year, respectively. The PHP group showed an 11.7% reduction of patients with complicated courses. No significant differences were seen in HLOS and discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: The PHP group showed a significant reduction in short-term mortality, a reduction in long-term mortality, and a reduction in the number of patients with complicated courses. The PHP protocol is a safe, strictly regulated, non-invasive fluid resuscitation protocol for the optimization of geriatric patients with a THF that requires minimal effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.

Simple Wound Irrigation in the Postoperative Treatment for Surgically Drained Spontaneous Soft Tissue Abscesses: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue abscesses are among the most frequently encountered medical problems treated by different surgeons. Standard therapy remains incision and drainage with sterile saline irrigation during postoperative wound healing period. Aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare sterile irrigation versus nonsterile irrigation. STUDY DESIGN: A single center randomized controlled trial was performed to investigate postoperative wound irrigation. The control group used sterile irrigation, and the intervention group used nonsterile irrigation. Primary endpoints were reinfection and reintervention rates, assessed during follow-up controls for up to 2 years. Secondary endpoints were the duration of wound healing, inability to work, pain and quality of life. RESULTS: Between 04/2016 and 05/2017, 118 patients were randomized into two groups, with 61 allocated to the control- and 57 to the intervention group. Reinfection occurred in a total of 4 cases (6.6%) in the sterile protocol and 4 (7%) in the nonsterile protocol. Quality of life and pain values were comparable during the wound healing period, and patients treated according to the nonsterile irrigation protocol used significantly fewer wound care service teams. Despite equal wound persistence rates, a substantially shorter amount of time off from work was reported in the nonsterile protocol group (p value 0.086). CONCLUSION: This prospective, randomized trial indicates that a nonsterile irrigation protocol for patients operated on for soft tissue abscesses is not inferior to the standard sterile protocol. Moreover, a nonsterile irrigation protocol leads to a shorter period of inability to work with comparable pain and quality of life scores during the wound healing period.

Inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures: a validation study.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, a new classification system for sternal fractures has been published in the Journal of Orthopedic trauma by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) foundation and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA). The aim of this study was to evaluate inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty multidetector computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with sternal fractures were classified independently by six senior and six junior orthopedic trauma surgeons of two level-1 trauma centers. Assessment was done on two occasions with an interval of 6 weeks. The kappa value was calculated to determine variability. RESULTS: The inter-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures showed fair-to-moderate agreement (kappa = 0.364). There was no significant difference between junior and senior surgeons. Analyses of the separate components of the classification demonstrated that agreement was lowest for classifying fracture type within the sternal body (kappa = 0.319) followed by manubrium (kappa = 0.525). The intra-observer variability showed moderate agreement with a mean kappa of 0.414. CONCLUSION: The inter- and intra-observer variability of the AO/OTA classification for sternal fractures shows fair-to-moderate agreement. The overall performance of the classification might be improved with minor modifications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic cross-sectional study (level I).

Absolute or relative stability in plate fixation for simple humeral shaft fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Minimal invasive plating (MIPO) techniques for humeral shaft fractures appear to have fewer complications and higher union rates compared to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). It is questionable if this also applies to simple humeral shaft fractures, as simple fractures are generally treated with absolute stability which cannot be obtained with MIPO. This raises the question whether biology or biomechanics is more important in fracture healing. This study was developed to investigate the biomechanical part of this equation. The aim of the study was to compare relative stability to absolute stability in simple humeral shaft fractures with regard to fracture healing METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients treated with plate fixation for AO/OTA type A1-B3 humeral shaft fractures. Patients were categorized into two groups: absolute stability and relative stability. Both groups were compared with regard to time to radiological union and full weight bearing RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the relative-stability-group with either an AO/OTA type A (n = 18) or type B (n = 12) humeral shaft fracture and a mean age of 55 (SD 21) years. A total of 46 patients were included in the absolute-stability-group: 27 patients had a type A and 19 type B fracture. The mean age in this group was 45 (SD 19) years. Median follow-up was 12 months (IQR 8-13). Minimally invasive approach was used in 15 (50%) patients in the relative stability group. Time to radiological union was significantly shorter in the absolute-stability-group with a median of 14 (IQR 12-22) versus 25 (IQR17-36) weeks and HR 2.60 (CI 1.54-4.41)(p < 0.001). This difference remained significant after correction for type of approach (adjusted HR 3.53 CI 1.72-7.21) (p 0.001). There was no significant difference in time to full weight bearing. The addition of lag screws in the absolute stability group did not influence time to radiological healing or full weight bearing. CONCLUSION: Absolute stability for simple humeral shaft fractures leads to a significantly shorter time to radiological union compared to relative stability. The addition of lag screws to gain interfragmentary compression does not reduce fracture healing time.

The implementation of a Geriatric Fracture Centre for hip fractures to reduce mortality and morbidity: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an orthogeriatric treatment model on elderly patients with traumatic hip fractures (THF). The Geriatric Fracture Centre (GFC) is a multidisciplinary care pathway with attention for possible age-related diseases, discharge management and out-of-hospital treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study with a historical cohort group was conducted at a level I trauma centre in Switzerland. Patients over the age of 70 years with THFs who underwent surgical treatment at GFC in 2013 and 2016 were included. Primary outcomes were mortality and complications. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (HLOS), time to surgery and place of discharge. RESULTS: A total of 322 patients were included in this study. In 2016, mortality showed a reduction of 2.9% at 30 days (p = 0.42) and 3.4% at 90 days (p = 0.42) and 0.1% at 1 year (p = 0.98). The number of patients with a complicated course showed a decrease of 2.2% in 2016 (p = 0.69). A significant increase in the diagnosis of delirium by 11.2% was seen in 2016 (p < 0.001). The median HLOS was significantly reduced by 2 days (p < 0.001). An increase of 21.1% was seen in patients who were sent to rehabilitation in 2016 (p < 0.001). Day-time surgery increased by 10.2% (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The implementation of the GFC leads to improved processes and outcomes for geriatric patients with THFs. Increased awareness and recognition led to an increase in the diagnosis of complications that would otherwise remain untreated. Expanding these efforts might lead to more significant effects and an increase in the reduction of morbidity and mortality in the future.

Secondary prevention of minor trauma fractures: the effects of a tailored intervention-an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Minor trauma fractures (MTF) in the elderly are associated with an increase in mortality, morbidity, and the risk of subsequent fractures. Often, these patients who sustain MTF have an underlying bone disease, such as osteopenia or osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is known to be underdiagnosed and undertreated, and adequate treatment is essential to reduce the occurrence of MTFs. At our hospital, this has led to the implementation of Osteofit, a patient-education-based intervention targeted at improving screening and prevention of osteoporosis, with the goal to reduce the rate of subsequent MTF. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of Osteofit in improving osteoporosis screening and treatment in patients after an initial MTF episode. METHODS: The study is a prospective, single-center, cohort study of MTF patients aged 50 years or older. A standardized questionnaire and telephone interview were used to collect 1-year follow-up data. The primary outcome was the rate of patients undergoing Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scanning. Secondary outcomes were the rate of patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia, the rate of patients treated with anti-osteoporotic medication, and the rate of patients with a subsequent fracture. DXA scanning rate, the prevalence of a diagnosis (osteoporosis/osteopenia), and data on medical treatment for osteoporosis were compared to the results of a previous study in the same hospital, published in 2004. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2015, 411 of 823 eligible patients consented to participate and were included in this study. The mean age was 72 ± 9.3 years. Sixty-three percent (63.3%, n = 252) of the patients received a DXA scan, compared to 12.6% reported in our previous study. Of all patients who received a DXA scan, 199 (82.9%) were diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia. A total of 95 patients (23.1%) received specific medical treatment for osteoporosis and 59.8% reported the intake of any unspecific medication (vitamin D, calcium, or both). Fifteen patients (3.9%) had a subsequent fracture as a result of a minor trauma fall. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a MTF secondary prevention program with dedicated health professionals improved the rate of patients who underwent DXA screening by fivefold. Despite this improvement, DXA screening was missed in over a third of patients, with only 23% of eligible patients receiving specific medical treatment for osteoporosis at 1-year follow-up. Consequently, this tailored intervention is a promising first step in improving geriatric fracture care. However, further work to improve the rate of osteoporosis screening and medical treatment initiation for the long-term prevention of subsequent MTF is recommended. We believe osteoporosis screening and adequate osteoporosis medication should be integrated as standard procedure in the aftercare of MTF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

[Reduction techniques for minimally invasive stabilization of proximal humeral fractures]. / Repositionstechniken bei minimal-invasiver Stabilisierung proximaler Humerusfrakturen.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of surgical stabilization of proximal humerus fractures is to restore the anatomical relations between the greater and lesser tubercle, to reconstruct the joint and preserve the vascular supply of the fragments. INDICATIONS: Approximately 80% of proximal humeral fractures can be treated conservatively. Surgical treatment is indicated based on the fracture pattern, patient-related factors and the risk of avascular head necrosis. Two-part fractures with a metaphyseal comminution zone and 3/4-part fractures can benefit from near to anatomic reconstruction depending on the patient's demands and bone quality. Minimally invasive stabilization procedures allow for an anatomical reconstruction in the majority of fresh proximal humeral fractures with or without a proximal shaft fracture, provided that intraoperative traction allows the fracture to be aligned axially in the image intensifier by ligamentotaxis. Indirect, combined with direct reduction maneuvers, allow for an almost anatomical reconstruction, despite minimal invasive approaches. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Beach chair position. The arm is held in a pneumatic articulating traction device. Evaluation of the indirect reduction potential by ligamentotaxis with visualization of the alignment of the head fragments in relation to the shaft by traction, abduction/adduction, flexion/extension and rotation. The traction device and a foam roll in the axilla to neutralize the tension of the pectoralis major and teres major muscles while simultaneously adducting the elbow hold the reduction. Insufficient reduction of the fragments requires additional direct reduction maneuvers. Opening of the bursa and fixation of the rotator cuff with sutures to adjust reposition. A 2.5 mm-threaded K­wire is inserted into the head fragment as a joystick. Under protection of the axillary nerve, the plate is inserted under protection of the axillary nerve. Temporary fixation of the plate with Kirschner wires for positioning the plate 5-8 mm below the greater tubercle and 2-3 mm laterally of the sulcus of the long biceps tendon and subsequent radiographic control. Reduction of the shaft against the plate with a cortex screw. The threaded K­wire in the head can be used to adjust the varus and valgus alignment and to achieve adequate support of the calcar. Finally, complete the osteosynthesis with angular stable screws. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immediate active assisted exercise in the shoulder under physiotherapeutic supervision. Temporary immobilization for patient comfort. Standard active and resistive mobilization after the first clinical and radiological checkup 6 weeks after surgery. Further radiological checks after 3 and 6 months and 1 year. No routine plate removal.

[Definitions and explanations on the topic of fracture reduction]. / Definitionen und Erklärungen zum Thema Frakturreposition.

The process of reduction is a key step for successful fracture treatment. The goal of fracture reduction is the realignment of the displaced fractured fragments caused by muscle tension or impaction back into the original anatomic relationship. The reduction process includes not only the application of force at or remote from the fracture site to reverse the deforming forces but also the preoperative planning where to apply these forces and by what means. Furthermore, consideration should be preoperatively given on how to position the patient and the C­arm and how to temporarily maintain reduction for intraoperative x­ray control of the axis, rotation and lengths before definitive fixation.

Sustainability in humanitarian surgery during medical short-term trips (MSTs): feasibility of inguinal hernia repair in rural Nigeria over 6 years and 13 missions.

PURPOSE: Surgical teaching missions are known to contribute significantly in reducing the local burden of disease. However, the value of short-term medical service trips (MSTs) remains under debate. Humanitarian surgery is highly dependent on funding, and consequently, data evaluation is needed to secure funding for future projects. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the results of 6-year MSTs to rural Nigeria with a specific emphasis on hernia repairs. METHODS: Retrospective series of consecutive operations performed between 2011 and 2016 in rural Nigeria during 13 MSTs. Operations were categorized into type and number of procedures and origin of the surgeon. In terms of inguinal hernia repairs additional data was evaluated such as frequency of local anaesthesia (LA) and the type of hernia. The total amount of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted during each mission are presented and discussed with regard to sustainability of these missions. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2016, a total of 1674 patients were operated. Of these, 1302 patients were operated for 1481 hernias of which 36.7% accounting as inguinoscrotal hernias. The percentage of operations performed by Nigerian staff increased from 31 to 55%. Overall, eighteen percent of the operations was solely performed by Nigerians. Totally, we averted 8092.83 DALY's accounting for 5.46 DALY's per hernia. CONCLUSION: The presented missions contribute significantly to an improvement in local healthcare and decrease the burden of disease. We were able to show the sustainable character of these surgical missions. As a next step, we will analyse the cost-effectiveness of MSTs.

[Operative treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow : Open reduction and internal fixation]. / Operative Therapie der Terrible-Triad-Verletzung des Ellenbogens : Offene Reposition und interne Fixation.

AIM OF SURGERY: Reconstruction of the most important ligamentous and osseus structures of the elbow after terrible triad injury via the radial head to the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCL) and if necessary beginning at the coronoid process. The aim is a stable concentrically guided elbow with early functional follow-up treatment. The approach depends on the intraoperatively tested stability. INDICATIONS: Osteoligamentous terrible triad injury pattern with or without subluxation position following reduction and temporary immobilization. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Inoperable due to comorbidities. Concentric elbow with radial head fracture without impairment of pronation/supination, coronoid fragment <50% and stable range of motion up to 30°. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: Lateral access according to Kaplan or Kocher in order to address the anterior capsule/coronoid tip. Stabilization of the radial head with mini fragment screws and plates or radial head prosthesis. Osseous reinsertion of the LCL at its origin with transosseous sutures/bone anchors on the radial epicondyle of the humerus. In cases of persisting instability (hanging arm test) treatment with lateral movement fixation and/or the medial collateral ligaments from medial. FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT: Immobilization in upper arm plaster cast in the first postoperative days, active assistive pain-adapted movement therapy in the cast from postoperative day 1 and after 6-8 weeks resistive therapy in the whole elbow. RESULTS: Control of 15 terrible triad patients (mean age 45.9 years, range 20-87 years) after 9.6 months (range 2.6-31.6 months), extent of movement flexion/extension 131/14/0°, pronation/supination 78/0/67°. Arthrolysis after an average of 38 weeks in 4 patients, signs of joint arthrosis in 8, heterotopic ossification in 7 and neuropathic complaints in the region of the ulnar nerve in 1 patient. Early functional therapy with reproducible results by stabilization of osteoligamentous structures.

Absolute or relative stability in minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis of simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fractures?

INTRODUCTION: Minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fractures can be applied using absolute (lag screw and neutralisation plate; LSN) or relative stability (bridge plate; BP). The primary aim of the study was to compare time to radiological union and time to full weight bearing in the two groups (LSN vs. BP). Reduction was performed either percutaneously or by a minimally open approach (mini open). Secondary aim was to analyse the number of complications between both groups. METHODS: Retrospective single centre review of patients with a simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fracture operated with a Locking Compression Plate (LCP) between 2009 and 2015 in a Level one Trauma Centre. Postoperative radiographs were assessed in a standardised manner. Time to radiological fracture union and time to full weight bearing were observed. Callus index and postoperative complications were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were analysed. Forty-eight patients had a shaft (AO/OTA Type 42) and nine a distal tibia fracture (AO/OTA Type 43). Forty patients were treated with using the LSN concept and 17 patients with the BP concept. Median time to radiological fracture union was statistically significant shorter (p=0.04) in the LSN group with 19 weeks compared to 27 weeks in the BP-group. Time to full weight bearing was 10 weeks in both groups. A total (including implant removal) of 35 reoperations were performed in the LSN-group and 18 in the BP-group. Wound healing disorders (deep surgical site infections) were seen less the LSN group in 3/40 (7.5%) compared to the BP-group with 3/17 (17.6%). In the LSN group, there was no statistical difference in time to union or weight bearing between a percutaneous or mini open approach. CONCLUSION: Stable osteosynthesis of simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fractures leads to faster radiologic fracture healing without an increase in complications or number of revisions compared to bridge plating. If a percutaneous reduction is not feasible for the insertion of a lag screw, a mini-open approach does not lead to a delay in fracture healing.

[Distal humerus fracture-extensile approaches]. / Distale Humerusfraktur ­ Zugänge und Erweiterungen.

The majority of dislocated, intra-articular fractures are treated with an open reduction and internal fixation. In this paper we describe a variety of dorsal approaches to the distal humerus. Beside the dorsal approach through an olecranon osteotomy we also discuss the alternative dorsal approaches without osteotomy and their advantages and drawbacks. Moreover we discuss the preoperative planning and operative procedure. Early functional rehabilitation, without weight bearing, is important to achieve an optimal outcome. Finally we present the results of the last 6 years of patients treated operatively in our clinic with distal humeral fractures.

Reconstruction plates for midshaft clavicular fractures: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: For the fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures different plates are available, each with its specific pros and cons. The ideal plating choice for this lesion remains subject to ongoing discussion. Reconstruction plates are cheap and easily bendable, but their strength and stability have been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the failure rate of reconstruction plates in the fixation of clavicular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with a displaced, midshaft clavicular fracture (Robinson type 2a/2b) treated with a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate between 2006 and 2013 were evaluated. The primary outcome measure was reoperation rate due to implant failure. Secondary outcome measures were nonunion, symptomatic malunion and elective plate removal. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients were analyzed. During a median follow-up of 8 months, 14 patients (12.6%) had implant failure, of which 7 (6.3%) required a reoperation. Three nonunions (2.7%) and no symptomatic malunions occurred. Plate removal was indicated in 37.8% of patients because of implant irritation. DISCUSSION: The incidence of reoperation due to implant failure following clavicular plate fixation with a reconstruction plate is 6.3%. Although comparison with other plate types is difficult since rates in literature vary greatly, reoperation rates in other plates are reported around 2-3%, suggesting that reconstruction plates have a higher incidence of implant failure warranting reoperation. Therefore, especially in patients with known risk factors for complications (e.g. smoking, osteoporosis, comminuted fractures), a stronger plate than a reconstruction plate should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective study.